1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1947 Talbot T 26 (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1947 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda Cosmo | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Mazda | Talbot |
| Model | Cosmo | T 26 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1947 |
| Engine Size | 2210 cc | 4481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3130 mm |
