1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1978 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 410 kg more than 1978 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda Cosmo | 1978 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Cosmo | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1981 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |