1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1988 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1988 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 45 kg more than 1988 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda Cosmo | 1988 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | Cosmo | Reliant |
Year Released | 1981 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2210 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2260 mm |