1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1989 Honda Integra
To start off, 1989 Honda Integra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (120 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Honda Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1989 Honda Integra.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Honda Integra has automatic transmission and 1981 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1981 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Honda Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda Cosmo | 1989 Honda Integra | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | Cosmo | Integra |
Year Released | 1981 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2450 mm |