1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1994 Renault Ludo

To start off, 1994 Renault Ludo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1994 Renault Ludo. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1994 Renault Ludo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 83 kg more than 1994 Renault Ludo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Renault Ludo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (167 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Ludo. (107 Nm). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Ludo. 1994 Renault Ludo has automatic transmission and 1981 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1981 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Renault Ludo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: