1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Toyota Conquest
To start off, 1996 Toyota Conquest is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,973 cc, 1996 Toyota Conquest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Conquest (174 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Conquest should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Conquest weights approximately 18 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (167 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota Conquest. (135 Nm). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Toyota Conquest | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Cosmo | Conquest |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1973 cc |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 174 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 1116 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2740 mm |
