1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 ZAZ Slavuta

To start off, 2003 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,292 cc (2 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (120 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 405 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Mazda Cosmo 2003 ZAZ Slavuta
Make Mazda ZAZ
Model Cosmo Slavuta
Year Released 1981 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2292 cc 1091 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 51 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1150 kg 745 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2330 mm