1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 148 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (167 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mazda Cosmo | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Cosmo | Rustler |
Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2570 mm |