1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (121 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | Cosmo | 207 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2210 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 121 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1397 mm |
