1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 18 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | Cosmo | C-Zero |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
