1981 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis
To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1981 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Ractis (158 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Ractis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda RX-7. 2006 Toyota Ractis has automatic transmission and 1981 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1981 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Toyota Ractis will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda RX-7 | 2006 Toyota Ractis | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | RX-7 | Ractis |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
