1981 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2000 Acura EL
To start off, 2000 Acura EL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mercedes-Benz T is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mercedes-Benz T weights approximately 271 kg more than 2000 Acura EL.
Because 1981 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mercedes-Benz T | 2000 Acura EL | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Acura |
| Model | T | EL |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1079 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2619 mm |
