1981 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am weights approximately 64 kg more than 1981 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 1981 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am has automatic transmission and 1981 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1981 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mercedes-Benz T | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Pontiac |
| Model | T | Grand Am |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1414 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2730 mm |
