1981 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 384 kg more than 1981 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 1981 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1981 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1981 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mercedes-Benz T | 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Chevrolet |
Model | T | Equinox |
Year Released | 1981 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2858 mm |