1981 Mercury Cougar vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1981 Mercury Cougar is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mercury Cougar (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 706 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mercury Cougar | 1966 Renault 4 | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Cougar | 4 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2410 mm |