1981 Mercury Cougar vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mercury Cougar (114 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1981 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Mercury Cougar (237 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Peugeot 207. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1981 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mercury Cougar | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Mercury | Peugeot |
| Model | Cougar | 207 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1358 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
