1981 Mercury Cougar vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (230 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1981 Mercury Cougar. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mercury Cougar | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | Mercury | Audi |
Model | Cougar | A6 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2833 mm |