1981 Mercury Lynx vs. 2009 Pontiac Solstice
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac Solstice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Solstice (287 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1981 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Pontiac Solstice weights approximately 379 kg more than 1981 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Pontiac Solstice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Pontiac Solstice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mercury Lynx | 2009 Pontiac Solstice | |
Make | Mercury | Pontiac |
Model | Lynx | Solstice |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 287 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1329 kg |