1981 Mini Clubman vs. 1995 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1995 Ford Falcon is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,705 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Falcon weights approximately 930 kg more than 1981 Mini Clubman.
Because 1995 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1981 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1981 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mini Clubman | 1995 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Mini | Ford |
| Model | Clubman | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1097 cc | 3705 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2800 mm |
