1981 Mini Clubman vs. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 2,444 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1981 Mini Clubman.
Because 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mini Clubman | 2000 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | Mini | Toyota |
Model | Clubman | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1097 cc | 2444 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1960 mm |