1981 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 929 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Dodge |
Model | Celeste | Challenger |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1874 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2946 mm |