1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1302 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 1960 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Colt | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 1981 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3070 mm |