1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Colt | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1981 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2670 mm |