1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1979 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 540 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1979 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 1979 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Colt | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |
