1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Subaru Outback weights approximately 680 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Subaru |
Model | Colt | Outback |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2660 mm |