1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2003 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2003 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota RAV4 weights approximately 468 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2003 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 2003 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Colt | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1278 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2500 mm |