1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 687 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Daewoo |
Model | Colt | Evanda |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2710 mm |