1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2004 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Opel Omega is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Omega weights approximately 855 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 2004 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Opel |
Model | Colt | Omega |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2740 mm |