1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC90 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1370 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Colt | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1244 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2860 mm |
