1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 195 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Because 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Sapporo | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Sapporo | Clio |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 137 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2580 mm |