1981 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 1995 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1995 Nissan Cima is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Cima weights approximately 500 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Sigma | 1995 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
Model | Sigma | Cima |
Year Released | 1981 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |