1981 Nissan Cherry vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 988 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Nissan Cherry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 110 kg more than 1981 Nissan Cherry.
Because 2006 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Nissan Cherry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 1981 Nissan Cherry has manual transmission. 1981 Nissan Cherry will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Nissan Cherry | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Cherry | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 988 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 775 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 1820 mm |
