1981 Nissan Leopard vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva weights approximately 205 kg more than 1981 Nissan Leopard.
Because 1981 Nissan Leopard is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Nissan Leopard. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva has automatic transmission and 1981 Nissan Leopard has manual transmission. 1981 Nissan Leopard will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Nissan Leopard | 2000 Oldsmobile Achieva | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Leopard | Achieva |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1768 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1750 mm |
