1981 Nissan Leopard vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1981 Nissan Leopard. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1981 Nissan Leopard.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Nissan Leopard. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Nissan Leopard | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Leopard | Matrix |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1768 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |