1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 311 kg more than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Triumph |
| Model | Cutlass | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2568 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2140 mm |
