1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1966 Rover P5
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rover P5 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1966 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1966 Rover P5 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rover |
Model | Cutlass | P5 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2820 mm |