1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1969 Opel Admiral
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Opel Admiral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Opel Admiral would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Opel Admiral is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Opel Admiral weights approximately 415 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1969 Opel Admiral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Opel Admiral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1969 Opel Admiral | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Opel |
Model | Cutlass | Admiral |
Year Released | 1981 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 5354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2860 mm |