1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 309 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Rover |
| Model | Cutlass | 3.5 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2568 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2820 mm |
