1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1995 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1995 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 366 kg more than 1995 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1995 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cutlass | Polo |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2568 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 73 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
