1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 1996 Volvo 850 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo 850 weights approximately 64 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | 850 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2568 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2670 mm |