1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2002 Toyota Solara is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Solara weights approximately 69 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Toyota Solara | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Solara |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2568 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2680 mm |
