1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 516 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Subaru |
Model | Cutlass | R2 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2568 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |