1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero (140 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 39 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 203 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cutlass | Alero |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1359 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
