1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Rover 75 weights approximately 124 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rover |
Model | Cutlass | 75 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2568 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |