1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 390 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | Cutlass | Clio |
Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |