1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Subaru Outback is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Subaru Outback weights approximately 105 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Subaru |
Model | Cutlass | Outback |
Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2680 mm |