1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Audi |
Model | Cutlass | A5 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4625 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2751 mm |