1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 601 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Cutlass | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2748 mm |
