1981 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 40 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Omega | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | Omega | Clio |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |