1981 Oldsmobile Omega vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo C70 (242 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo C70 (330 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega. (183 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Oldsmobile Omega | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Omega | C70 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2327 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 242 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2800 mm |